Skip to main content

Subset Sum Problem - Medium


Problem : Given a set of integers A, find out if there is a subset of A which add up to a particular integer K.

Formally called the Subset Sum Problem, we are given an NP-Complete problem. To solve this, we have to exhaustively search every subset and verify if they add up to an integer K.

Let's begin with a Brute force DFS search, we're going to construct subsets incrementally until the sum exceeds K. The elements are assumed sorted in the increasing order.


So we perform a DFS trying to perform every combination of the elements in the set. The recursive function either will include an element in the sum or exclude it. The guard prunes off DFS paths that exceed the sum required.

There is an efficient method for this, using Dynamic Programming. Essentially, we start with a single element, add the next element together to get the new sums possible. These new sums will be the input for the next iteration. I'll explain with an example, say we have {a,b,c}


  • You start with a set, lets call it partial_sums = {0}. For each element in the partial_sums we add a to the set. So after one iteration we have {0,0+a} ie {0,a}
  • Now for b, repeat the procedure. This gives us partial_sums =  {0,a,b,a+b}
  • Finally, c gives us {0,a,b,c,a+c,b+c,a+b+c}
  • Note : if any sum exceeds K we don't need to add it to the set (assuming the initial set was sorted, since the sum can only increase.)
Here's the solution implemented.


Here's the complete gist
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Find Increasing Triplet Subsequence - Medium

Problem - Given an integer array A[1..n], find an instance of i,j,k where 0 < i < j < k <= n and A[i] < A[j] < A[k]. Let's start with the obvious solution, bruteforce every three element combination until we find a solution. Let's try to reduce this by searching left and right for each element, we search left for an element smaller than the current one, towards the right an element greater than the current one. When we find an element that has both such elements, we found the solution. The complexity of this solution is O(n^2). To reduce this even further, One can simply apply the longest increasing subsequence algorithm and break when we get an LIS of length 3. But the best algorithm that can find an LIS is O(nlogn) with O( n ) space . An O(nlogn) algorithm seems like an overkill! Can this be done in linear time? The Algorithm: We iterate over the array and keep track of two things. The minimum value iterated over (min) The minimum increa
2 comments
Read more

Merge k-sorted lists - Medium

Problem - Given k-sorted lists, merge them into a single sorted list. A daft way of doing this would be to copy all the list into a new array and sorting the new array. ie O(n log(n)) The naive method would be to simply perform k-way merge similar to the auxiliary method in Merge Sort. But that is reduces the problem to a minimum selection from a list of k-elements. The Complexity of this algorithm is an abysmal O(nk). Here's how it looks in Python. We maintain an additional array called Index[1..k] to maintain the head of each list. We improve upon this by optimizing the minimum selection process by using a familiar data structure, the Heap! Using a MinHeap, we extract the minimum element from a list and then push the next element from the same list into the heap, until all the list get exhausted. This reduces the Time complexity to O(nlogk) since for each element we perform O(logk) operations on the heap. An important implementation detail is we need to keep track
Post a Comment
Read more

Inversion Count - Medium

Given an Array A[1..n] of distinct integers find out how many instances are there where A[i] > A[j] where i < j. Such instances can be called Inversions. Say, [100,20,10,30] the inversions are (100,20), (100, 10), (100,30), (20,10) and the count is of course 4 The question appears as an exercise in the  Chapter 4 of Introduction to Algorithms .  (3rd Edition) As per our tradition we'll start with the worst algorithm and incrementally improve upon it. So on with it. So the complexity of the algorithm is O(n^2). We can do this even faster using divide and conquer, more aptly if we use a variation of Merge Sort . To do this, unfortunately, we will have to mutate the array. The key to the algorithm is to understand that in an ascending sorted array the inversion count is zero. Say [10,20,30] If we perhaps have an element 100 before the rest of the array, the inversion count becomes 3. [100,10,20,30]. If we placed the 100 at the second position the inversi
Post a Comment
Read more