Skip to main content

Merge k-sorted lists - Medium


Problem - Given k-sorted lists, merge them into a single sorted list.
A daft way of doing this would be to copy all the list into a new array and sorting the new array. ie O(n log(n))

The naive method would be to simply perform k-way merge similar to the auxiliary method in Merge Sort. But that is reduces the problem to a minimum selection from a list of k-elements. The Complexity of this algorithm is an abysmal O(nk).

Here's how it looks in Python. We maintain an additional array called Index[1..k] to maintain the head of each list.

def merge(arr):
k = len(arr)
index = [0] * k
lst = []
while True:
mni = None
for i in xrange(k):
if index[i] < len(arr[i]) and (mni == None or arr[i][index[i]] < arr[mni][index[mni]]):
mni = i
if mni == None: break
lst.append(arr[mni][index[mni]])
index[mni] += 1
return lst
view raw gistfile1.txt hosted with ❤ by GitHub
We improve upon this by optimizing the minimum selection process by using a familiar data structure, the Heap! Using a MinHeap, we extract the minimum element from a list and then push the next element from the same list into the heap, until all the list get exhausted.

This reduces the Time complexity to O(nlogk) since for each element we perform O(logk) operations on the heap. An important implementation detail is we need to keep track of the origins of the elements of the heap, ie the list it came from and it's index. Therefore, I use a 3 member tuple (item, list-index, item-index) and push it onto the heap.

Fortunately for us, Python has the heapq module for implementing a heap. So here's the code.

def merge2(arr):
heap = [(l[0],i,0) for i,l in enumerate(arr) if len(l) > 0]
heapq.heapify(heap)
lst = []
while heap:
item,lst_index,item_index = heapq.heappop(heap)
lst.append(item)
if item_index + 1 < len(arr[lst_index]):
heapq.heappush(heap,(arr[lst_index][item_index+1],lst_index,item_index+1))
return lst
view raw gistfile1.txt hosted with ❤ by GitHub

The entire code can be found here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Find Increasing Triplet Subsequence - Medium

Problem - Given an integer array A[1..n], find an instance of i,j,k where 0 < i < j < k <= n and A[i] < A[j] < A[k]. Let's start with the obvious solution, bruteforce every three element combination until we find a solution. Let's try to reduce this by searching left and right for each element, we search left for an element smaller than the current one, towards the right an element greater than the current one. When we find an element that has both such elements, we found the solution. The complexity of this solution is O(n^2). To reduce this even further, One can simply apply the longest increasing subsequence algorithm and break when we get an LIS of length 3. But the best algorithm that can find an LIS is O(nlogn) with O( n ) space . An O(nlogn) algorithm seems like an overkill! Can this be done in linear time? The Algorithm: We iterate over the array and keep track of two things. The minimum value iterated over (min) The minimum increa...

The Missing Number - Easy

For my first post, let's start with an easy one. It's a popular question among interviewers and you prolly have heard about this one. Never the less, let's solve it, for old times sake. :) Problem : Given an Array of integers of size N. The array contains all the numbers from 1 to N in arbitrary order. But one number (say X) has been replaced with 0. Find the missing number in the most efficient way possible. Solution: Before we get to the solution, we'll build a test case using the following Python Snippet. The Naive method is an O(n^2) algorithm, where we perform a linear search (ie O(n) ) for each element 1-N. For small values of N, this is perfectly fine but can we do better? Of course, with a small bit of help from 8th grade maths. Hopefully, you remember that, 1+2+3....+n = n (n+1)/2 So how does that help? Say we didn't have any missing number and the problem was simply to sum all the elements of the array? Since we know the array contains ...