Skip to main content

Dijkstra's algorithm - Part 1 - Tutorial


This will be a 3 Part series of posts where I will be implementing the Dijkstra's Shortest Path algorithm in Python. The three parts will be


1) Representing the Graph
2) Priority Queue
3) The Algorithm

To represent a graph we'll be using an Adjacency List. Another alternative is using an Adjacency Matrix, but for a sparse graph an Adjacency List is more efficient.

Adjacency List

An Adjacency List is usually represented as a HashTable (or an Array) where an entry at `u` contains a Linked List. The Linked List contains `v` and optionally another parameter `w`. Here `u` and `v` are node(or vertex) labels and `w` is the weight of the edge. By Traversing the linked list we obtain the immediate neighbours of `u`. Visually, it looks like this.


For implementing this in Python, we'll be using the dict() for the main HashTable. For the Linked List we can use a list of 2 sized tuples (v,w). 

Sidenote: Instead of a list of tuples, you can use a dict(), with the key as `v` and value as weight (or a tuple of edge properties). The  Advantage being you can check for adjacency faster. In Dijkstra, we don't need that check, so I'll stick with a list for now.
So here's the python code

import fileinput
# add_edge (u -> v) with weight w to graph g
def add_edge(graph,u,v,w):
if u in graph: #vertex u already in graph?
l = graph[u] #get list of neighbours
else:
graph[u] = l = list() #insert u into graph and assign an empty list of neighbours
l.append((v,w)) #append tuple (v,w) into the neighbour list
g = dict() #initialize graph
for line in fileinput.input():
u,v,w = map(int,line.split())
add_edge(g,u,v,w)
add_edge(g,v,u,w) #undirected graph, edges go both ways
print g
view raw Adjacency List hosted with ❤ by GitHub
The above program simply reads 3 integers per line from the data piped to it (or a file passed as an argument)

I'll be using the undirected graph from Wikipedia for reference. Here's the graph followed by its textual representation.



(Sorry about the overlapping edge labels, I'm new to Graphviz.)

1 2 7
1 3 9
1 6 14
2 3 10
2 4 15
3 4 11
3 6 2
4 5 6
5 6 9

So what have we accomplished so far? We essentially have stored the entire graph as a data structure, where we can iterate over the neighbours of any vertex using something like
for (v,w) in graph[u]:
print "%d connected to %d with weight %d" % (u,v,w)
That's it for this part. In the next part, we'll be building our very own Priority Queue with a little help from Python's Standard modules. Until next time...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Find Increasing Triplet Subsequence - Medium

Problem - Given an integer array A[1..n], find an instance of i,j,k where 0 < i < j < k <= n and A[i] < A[j] < A[k]. Let's start with the obvious solution, bruteforce every three element combination until we find a solution. Let's try to reduce this by searching left and right for each element, we search left for an element smaller than the current one, towards the right an element greater than the current one. When we find an element that has both such elements, we found the solution. The complexity of this solution is O(n^2). To reduce this even further, One can simply apply the longest increasing subsequence algorithm and break when we get an LIS of length 3. But the best algorithm that can find an LIS is O(nlogn) with O( n ) space . An O(nlogn) algorithm seems like an overkill! Can this be done in linear time? The Algorithm: We iterate over the array and keep track of two things. The minimum value iterated over (min) The minimum increa...

Find the Quadruplets - Hard

Problem - Given 4 arrays A,B,C,D. Find out if there exists an instance where A[i] + B[j] + C[k] + D[l] = 0 Like the Find the Triple problem, we're going to develop 4 algorithms to solve this. Starting with the naive O(n^4) solution. Then we proceed to eliminate the inner-most loop with a Binary Search, reducing the complexity to O(n^3 logn) Now, we replace the last 2 loops with the left-right traversal we did in the previous 3 posts. Now the complexity is O(n^3). Finally, we reduce the complexity to O(n^2 logn) at the cost of O(n^2) Space Complexity. We store every combination of A[i] + B[j] and store it in AB[]. Similarly we make CD[] out of C[i] + D[j]. So, AB = A x B CD = C x D We then sort AB and CD (which costs O(n^2 log(n^2)) ~ O(n^2 logn) ) and then run a left-right linear Algorithm on AB and CD. (Note : Their size is of the order O(n^2)) So the overall complexity is due to sorting the large array of size n^2. which is O(n^2 logn).